Wiley v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
It is conceded by the plaintiff that a new trial granted in the interests of justice is a highly discretionary order and that this court will not reverse such an order unless it clearly appears that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. Flowever, the plaintiff contends that there was a clear abuse of judicial discretion. It is contended that the trial court’s determination that the jury’s finding as to plaintiff’s negligence as to lookout was against the great weight of the evidence is not sustained on the basis of all the evidence. It is next contended that in making that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Bailey v. ZwirowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Gibson v. StreeterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Elsie McDonnell Guardian of the Estate of Ronald McDonnell and Elsie McDonnell Individually v. Jeanette TimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Harris v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.