Rae Ann Rumery v. Maria baier/doug Ducey
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona’s Constitution directs that “whenever any monies shall be in any manner derived from” state trust lands, the monies “shall be deposited” into a permanent fund to serve the purpose for which the land was granted. Ariz. Const. art. 10, § 7(A). We hold that A.R.S. § 37-527 (Supp.2012) violates this provision by diverting up to ten percent of certain trust land proceeds to a management fund rather than depositing them into a permanent fund.
I
A
¶ 2 In 1910, Congress passed the New Mexico-Arizona Enabling Act, granting Arizona more than ten million acres…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Ervien v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. William MixtonArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Friedman v. Cave Creek Unified School District No. 93Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.