Legal Opinion

Rae Ann Rumery v. Maria baier/doug Ducey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2013No. CV-11-0358-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona’s Constitution directs that “whenever any monies shall be in any manner derived from” state trust lands, the monies “shall be deposited” into a permanent fund to serve the purpose for which the land was granted. Ariz. Const. art. 10, § 7(A). We hold that A.R.S. § 37-527 (Supp.2012) violates this provision by diverting up to ten percent of certain trust land proceeds to a management fund rather than depositing them into a permanent fund.

I

A

¶ 2 In 1910, Congress passed the New Mexico-Arizona Enabling Act, granting Arizona more than ten million acres…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ervien v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State of Arizona v. William MixtonArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Friedman v. Cave Creek Unified School District No. 93Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Saban Rent-A-Car LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API