Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Frank and Lorain Kadish, Marion Pick-ens, and the Arizona Education Association, petitioners, brought a taxpayers’ action against the Arizona State Land Department and others. The issue raised is whether the fixed royalty provisions of A.R.S. § 27-234(B), permitting the land department to lease minerals on a flat rate royalty, violate the appraisal and true value provisions of the Arizona Enabling Act and the comparable provisions of the state constitution.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The individual petitioners are taxpayers who allege that their taxes support…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wyoming v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.