Legal Opinion
Asarco Inc. v. Kadish
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 30, 1989No. 87-1661PublishedCited by 689 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
The ultimate question for our decision is whether Arizona’s statute governing mineral leases on state lands is void because it does not conform with the federal laws that originally-granted those lands from the United States to Arizona. First, however, there is a difficult question about our own jurisdiction, a matter which touches on essential aspects of the proper relation between state and federal courts.
*610I
Various individual taxpayers and the Arizona Education Association, which represents approximately 20,000 public schoolteachers throughout the State, brought suit in Arizona state court,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by689 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
684 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.