Cox v. Mulligan
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s refusal to award the prevailing plaintiff attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code § 12-120(4). We reverse the district court and award attorney fees on appeal.
I. ANALYSIS
While driving a car owned by Charles Cates, Valorie Mulligan collided with the rear of Lloyd Cox’s car, injuring him. He sued Ms. Mulligan and Mr. Cates, and the jury awarded him $2,287.05 in special damages and $6,000.00 in general damages, for a total award of $8,287.05. Following the jury trial, Cox requested an award of attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lettunich v. Key Bank National Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Driver v. SI CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Cox v. MuellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Contreras v. RubleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Lake v. PurnellIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Bennett v. PatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Contreras v. RubleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006