Legal Opinion

Cox v. Mulligan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2005No. 30940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s refusal to award the prevailing plaintiff attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code § 12-120(4). We reverse the district court and award attorney fees on appeal.

I. ANALYSIS

While driving a car owned by Charles Cates, Valorie Mulligan collided with the rear of Lloyd Cox’s car, injuring him. He sued Ms. Mulligan and Mr. Cates, and the jury awarded him $2,287.05 in special damages and $6,000.00 in general damages, for a total award of $8,287.05. Following the jury trial, Cox requested an award of attorney fees pursuant to Idaho Code §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lettunich v. Key Bank National Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Driver v. SI CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Cox v. MuellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Contreras v. RubleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lake v. PurnellIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bennett v. PatrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Contreras v. RubleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API