Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Rubley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 31123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This case involves a personal injury action brought by respondents Ramiro G. Contreras and Omar Baeza Martinez against appellant Clare B. Rubley as a result of a three-car accident. A jury found Contreras and Baeza Martinez were entitled to a portion of their damages caused by the accident. Contreras claimed less than $25,000 in damages and was awarded attorney fees under I.C. § 12-120(4). Baeza Martinez’s claim for damages was significantly more than $25,000 and the trial court awarded him attorney fees under I.R.C.P. 37(c). Rubley now appeals those attorney fee awards.

I.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bailey v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Freiburger v. J-U-B Engineers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allied Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of KootenaiIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stout v. Key Training Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Read v. HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Dennis Ray Hennefer v. Blaine County School District 61Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Grover v. WadsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API