Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Rubley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 31123Published

1Opinion of the Court

130 P.3d 1111 (2006)

142 Idaho 573

Ramiro G. CONTRERAS and Omar Baeza Martinez, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Clare B. RUBLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 31123.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2005 Term.

February 23, 2006.

Sasser & Inglis, P.C., Boise, for appellant. Clay M. Shockley argued.

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Janis, Boise, for respondents. John W. Kluksdal argued.

TROUT, Justice.

This case involves a personal injury action brought by respondents Ramiro G. Contreras and Omar Baeza Martinez against appellant Clare B. Rubley as a result of a three-car accident. A jury found Contreras and Baeza…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Robertson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bailey v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Freiburger v. J-U-B Engineers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API