Legal Opinion

Cox v. Mueller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1994No. 20591PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On May 17, 1991, Jack Cox and Gary Mueller, who worked as car salesmen, engaged in an argument at their mutual place of employment. The argument escalated and ultimately Mueller pushed Cox through a plate glass window. On August 1, 1991, Cox demanded by certified letter $3,000 from Mueller as payment for injuries suffered and medical costs incurred, but Mueller did not respond. Cox filed a complaint against Mueller on September 26, 1991, and an amended complaint on October 17, 1991, seeking (1) reimbursement for medical expenses and economic…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sampson v. LaytonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Beckmann v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pancoast v. Indian Cove Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Czerwinsky v. LieskeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Henderson v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. L & W SUPPLY CORP. v. Chartrand Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BarnesIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API