Legal Opinion
United States v. Allen
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 4, 2005No. 80-C-133PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRABB, District Judge.
The United States of America has petitioned this court to enforce administrative subpoenas issued by an Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Administrative Law Judge to respondents, Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, for certain documents, records and information related to respondent Allen’s scientific studies of the chemical 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-di-oxin (“TCDD”). The subpoenas were issued pursuant to Section 6 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (“FI-FRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 136d, concerning the possible cancellation of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pittston Stevedoring Corp. v. DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- In re ZuckertDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Andrews v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- United States v. AllenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982