Legal Opinion

The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 1982No. 80-2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

672 F.2d 1262

17 ERC 1013, 3 Ed. Law Rep. 274, 13

Envtl. L. Rep. 20,444

The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Intervening Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Dr. James R. ALLEN and John Van Miller, Respondents-Appellees,

and

James P. Wachtendonk, et al., Intervening Respondents-Appellees.

No. 80-2013.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Jan. 16, 1981.

Decided Feb. 25, 1982.

Edward W. Warren, Washington, D. C., Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for intervening petitioner-appellant.

J. Timothy Gratz, Madison, Wis., Victor J. Yannacone, Jr., Yannacone & Yannacone, Patchogue, N. Y., for respondents-appellees.

Before…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API