Legal Opinion · Concurrence

The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening v. Dr. James R. Allen and John Van Miller, and James P. Wachtendonk, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 25, 1982No. 80-2013Published

1ConcurrencePell, Circuit Judge

While there seems to be little dispute that the district court’s function in an enforcement proceeding such as the present-one is narrowly limited, and while, in my opinion, the district court in its hearing may well have been approaching the outer limits of matters which should properly have been considered, nevertheless, the careful analysis and close reasoning of the opinion of this court persuades me to concur in the result reached, and with the exceptions noted hereinafter, to concur in the court’s opinion. In concurring, I particularly note that this court’s opinion holds on the basis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. AllenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API