Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 23, 1983No. Nos. 82 C 7316, 82 C 7588, 83 C 1247 and 83 C 1248PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion of Dr. Arthur Herbst to quash a deposition subpoena directed to him which calls for the production of various research materials in his custody.1
*496The deposition subpoena was served on Dr. Herbst by E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. (“Squibb”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45. Squibb has been sued by Paul Renfroe and Nancy Deitchman (“plaintiffs”) in two separate cases brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. In these cases, plaintiffs allege that…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- South Fla. Blood Serv. v. RasmussenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. SwilleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Plough, Inc. v. National Academy of SciencesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Marsh v. Lake Forest HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.