Legal Opinion

Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 2001No. 94 W.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

SAYLOR, Justice.

We allowed appeal in this matter to consider the timeliness of a notice to an employer of a work-related partial hearing loss under Section 311 of the Workers’ Compensation Act.

Emil Socha (“Claimant”) has been employed by Bell Atlantic Pennsylvania, Inc. (“Employer”) since 1968, when he worked as a switchman at Employer’s facility in downtown Pittsburgh; he remained in that location until 1984. In this *604capacity, Claimant was responsible for maintaining and repairing line switching equipment, which included diesel engines, generators,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Price v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Caloric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Crompton Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. J.G. Furniture Division/Burlington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API