Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
SAYLOR, Justice.
We allowed appeal in this matter to consider the timeliness of a notice to an employer of a work-related partial hearing loss under Section 311 of the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Emil Socha (“Claimant”) has been employed by Bell Atlantic Pennsylvania, Inc. (“Employer”) since 1968, when he worked as a switchman at Employer’s facility in downtown Pittsburgh; he remained in that location until 1984. In this *604capacity, Claimant was responsible for maintaining and repairing line switching equipment, which included diesel engines, generators,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Price v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Caloric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Crompton Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- J.G. Furniture Division/Burlington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.