Legal Opinion

Caloric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge DOYLE.

Caloric Corporation (Employer) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), which had granted the claim petition of Stewart Shoemaker (Claimant) for specific loss benefits for the loss of his hearing in both ears.

Claimant worked, for Employer as a “dipper and flow coater” in its enamel department from May 1948 until November 16, 1990. He worked for no other employer during this entire time or thereafter. On November 2, 1993, Claimant filed a claim petition for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Beaver v. ORTENZICommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crompton Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API