Legal Opinion
A.I. Ex Rel. Iapalucci v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 19, 2005No. Civ.A. 04-828 CKKPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Rosemary and Michael Iapa-lucci, on behalf of their minor daughter, A.I., and in their own right, brought this action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA” or “the Act”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et. seq., against Defendants, the District of Columbia and Robert C. Rice, in his official capacity as Interim Superintendent of the District of Columbia Public Schools. The IDEA provides that all children with disabilities will be provided a free and appropriate public education (“FAPE”), and provides for procedural…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- N.S. Ex Rel. Stein v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- McAllister v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Alfono v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- J.N. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.