Legal Opinion
Turner v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1943PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Turner, on behalf of her grandson B.M., has brought this action against the District of Columbia pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”). Plaintiff appeals from an administrative decision that rejected her claim that defendant violated the IDEA by failing to provide B.M. with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”). Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the Cotirt' will grant in part…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- M.O. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Q. C-C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- M.G. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- N.W. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- James v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.