Lichty Ex Rel. Lichty v. Lichty Construction Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Riner, Justice.
The question to be determined in this case is what meaning the Legislature of this State intended should be given to certain words appearing in the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Wyoming where the term “workman” is undertaken to be defined. It involves the proper application of those words in the Act aforesaid to the facts and circumstances of the case at bar as regards the disposition of the claim of Ruth S. Lichty for death benefits under said Law and also the claims of a physician and mortician for professional services rendered in connection with the matter.
The facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Matter of Skouitchi v. . Chic Cloak Suit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Industrial Commission v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Millers' Mut. Casualty Co. v. HooverTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- McConnell v. Murphy Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wyoming State Treasurer v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Griess v. Office of the Attorney General, Division of Criminal InvestigationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Shillinglaw v. Owen Shillinglaw Fuel CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Seckman v. Wyo-Ben, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- County of Natrona v. Casper Air ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.