Legal Opinion
United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 4, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Plaintiff United States filed this civil in rem forfeiture action, alleging that the defendant funds — approximately $61.3 million in three different banks — are the proceeds of a wire fraud conspiracy and subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. §§ 981, 983 and 984. Claimants Hikmat Shadman Logistics Services Co., Hekmat Shadman General Trading, LLC, Faizy Elham Brothers, Ltd., Everest Faizy Logistics Services, Hikmatullah Shadman, Najibullah, and Rohullah move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) to dismiss the forfeiture action.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number XXXXXXXXDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dialysis Patient Citizens v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Erbe v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Grant v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.