Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Khan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2004No. 02-0401PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

Once again, we consider when an oil company may be held responsible for crimes committed by third parties against an employee of a lessee-dealer. In Exxon v. Tidwell, we held the answer “depends on whether the oil company possessed a right of control over the safety and security of the station.” 1 As we were adopting a new standard, we remanded for a new trial so the parties could present evidence directed to that standard. 2 In this case, we apply that standard to the evidence presented. Concluding there is no evidence the oil company here had a right to control security or premises…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Central Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. IslasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re AdvancePCS Health L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Randy Austin v. Kroger Texas, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API