Legal Opinion

Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1978No. B-6576PublishedCited by 341 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the no-duty doctrine is still a viable one in the trial of premises cases. This case deals with invitees and tenants and does not involve licensees or trespassers. Mrs. Ruth Parker was injured when she fell while descending a dark stairway located on the premises of Highland Park, Inc. She sued Highland Park and recovered a judgment on a jury verdict for $17,123.00. This case arose before the effective date of the comparative negligence statute. Art. 2212a. The trial court’s judgment for Mrs. Parker was upon the jury findings that…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Robert E. McKee, General Contractor v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1954

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by341 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API