Legal Opinion

Schlichtman v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1940No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

^Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Appellant, Schlichtman, instituted a trespass action in the Court of Common Pleas, No. 2, of Philadelphia County against appellees, Daniel Crawford and Charlotte Crawford, his landlords, and A. B. Moore, Constable, claiming damages for an excessive distraint and illegal sale., In appellant’s third amended Statement of Claim he averred, in paragraphs 13 and 14 thereof, that in a prior proceéding between these same parties in the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 he had filed a rule to open a judgment entered against him by virtue of an Averment of Default and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steel v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Larkins v. LindsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Penn-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Big Four Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Vondersmith v. UrbanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Lawman v. Peoples Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Nevling v. Commercial Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Exner v. ExnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. In Re KovalchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Fleming v. StrayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API