Legal Opinion

Terzian v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1929No. 27,045PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying Mm a new trial as to defendant C. J. Carlson and granting the other two defendants a new trial. As the new trial was not .granted for errors of law exclusively, that part of the order is not appealable; and the only question presented is Avhether the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial as to defendant C. J. Carlson.

The gist of the action was fraud and misrepresentation in respect to the location and value of five lots which plaintiff was induced to receive as part payment for a rooming house he transferred to defendant Birkland. When the case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Berkey v. JuddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Hinkley v. FreickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. State v. HorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Annis v. AnnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Hashimoto v. HalmHawaii Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API