Legal Opinion

Hashimoto v. Halm

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1953No. 2847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TOWSE, C. J.

This cause is before the court upon the bill of exceptions of appellant Halm, who appeals from a joint and several judgment of $3,000 against himself and three co-conspirators.

The errors specified are consolidated into the sole determinative issue: whether there was sufficient competent evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

The amended complaint alleges that Shigeru Kiyabu, George Tsutsui, Norman Ewack and Henry Halm “* * * were * * * members of a conspiracy which was established and which * * * existed for the illegal purpose of defrauding and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. NUDD v. Burrows, AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. YoshidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  3. Territory v. Kitabayashis.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Western Sunview Properties, LLC v. FedermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API