Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Keith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 3, 1950PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, sues for a commission, and sets up a breach of the following alleged exclusive sale agreement: “June 16, 1947, Exclusive sale of property. #26 Prospect St., West Bridgewater Mass., to my agent Florence M. Bartlett. We are asking $12,000 (will take as low as $11,000). She is to have exclusive sale of same — for 90 days. [Sgd.] Phyllis L. Keith.” The plaintiff’s only exception is to the granting of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

The jury could have found these facts from the testimony of the plaintiff, the only witness. On June 16, 1947, in a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. King Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Cape Cod Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Des Rivieres v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Kacavas v. DiamondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bump v. RobbinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Coan v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Nathan v. Tremont Storage Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Baumgartner v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Lattuca v. CusolitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API