Legal Opinion

Guyer v. Sterling Laundry Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1916No. L. A. No. 3498PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff, a young woman nineteen years of age, sustained severe injury to her hand while in the employ of defendant. She was engaged in operating a machine known as a “baby mangle,” a rapidly revolving heated cylinder about six feet long, used for the purpose of drying and pressing thin, soft fabrics, such as handkerchiefs, towels, etc. Plaintiff had been operating this machine for about two months before the accident happened. The machine itself appears to have been in perfect working order. At the time of the accident plaintiff was holding an apron in her hands and was stretching the apron…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. . Berlin and Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Wormell v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  3. Quinn v. Electric Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bresette v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sibbert v. Scotland Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lehmuth v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Satariano v. SleightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Alvarado v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Opelt v. Al. G. Barnes Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Ross v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API