Legal Opinion

Opelt v. Al. G. Barnes Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1919No. Civ. No. 2668PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff, by his guardian ad litem, brought this action against defendant for injuries, alleged to have been received by being scratched by a vicious leopard, one of a number of animals kept by defendant corporation in its circus. The animal was securely caged and was not at large. Defendant had judgment and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff, at the time of the accident was a boy of ten and one-half years of age. On the day in question, having paid the price of admission, he entered the circus to view the animals and witness the performance in the main tent. He first entered the tent in which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Biggs v. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ellis v. D'AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Nelson v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Irvine v. Rare Feline Breeding Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Baugh v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API