Legal Opinion

Ross v. San Francisco Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1953No. Civ. 15544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Vernon Ross, a junior high school student, and his father, brought this action against defendant, the school district, for damages for the loss of an eye by Vernon alleged to have been proximately caused by the defendant ’s negligent maintenance of and supervision over a buffing machine. At the close of plaintiffs ’ ease before a jury, defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted, and judgment entered for defendant. The sole ground of the motion, and of the order granting it, was that the evidence demonstrated that Vernon was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Card v. BomsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Shannon v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Paradise Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Hawk v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Calandri v. Ione Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Olsen v. McGillicuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API