Legal Opinion

Abila v. Spendrup

California Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1948No. L. A. 20063PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Jose Maria Abila died in December, 1943, leaving a will that was duly admitted to probate. Emelina Y. Abila, who was not mentioned in the will, filed a petition to determine heirship under section 1080 of the Probate Code, alleging that she is the widow of decedent. She also alleged that the entire estate was less than $2,500 and prayed that it be set aside to her as surviving spouse under section 640 of the Probate Code.

Petitioner married Paul Ortega in 1897, but this marriage was subsequently annulled. She married decedent in March, 1910. They separated in September, 1911, and decedent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of ModnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Kraemer v. KraemerNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Nemer v. NemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API