Legal Opinion
United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 25, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Plaintiff United States filed this civil in rem forfeiture action, alleging that the defendant funds — approximately $61.3 million in three different banks— are the proceeds of a wire fraud and subject to seizure under 18 U.S.C. §§ 981, 983 and 984. Claimants Hikmat Shadman Logistics Services Co., Hikmat Shadman General Trading, LLC, Faizy Elham Brothers, Ltd., Everest Faizy Logistics Services, Hikmatullah Shadman, Najibullah, and Rohullah move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 for a preliminary injunction to release the funds…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Matricia Moore v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. And John MorrillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Robinson v. Ergo Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Eberra v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Petty v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014