Legal Opinion
United States v. Sum of $70,990,605
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2012-1905PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
This is an in rem action seeking forfeiture of assets held at three U.S. banks by or for the benefit of the Afghanistan International Bank (“AIB”), the Emirates NBD Bank (“Emirates Bank”), and Bank Alfa-lah. Those assets, which the United States has seized, correspond to amounts previously deposited in overseas accounts at those banks in the names of three Afghan companies. The United States alleges that the funds deposited in the overseas accounts were fraudulently obtained as payment for transportation of U.S.…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bywalski v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Faktor v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Jgc Holdings Corporation v. Kingdom of SpainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Matos Rodriguez v. Pan American Health OrganizationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.