State of Arizona Ex Rel. Polk v. Hon. campbell/francis Frederick Kraps
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice TIMMER,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Under AR.S. § 13-3212, enhanced and consecutive sentencing provisions apply when a defendant is convicted of engaging in child prostitution knowing that the person is a minor aged fifteen, sixteen, or seventeen. We today hold that these provisions also apply when the “minor” is actually an undercover peace officer.
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The State indicted Francis Kraps on two counts of child prostitution in violation of A.R.S. § 13-3212(B)(2). 1 During a pre-trial hearing, the superior court advised Kraps that if he was convicted, the court was required to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainArizona Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Bsi Holdings, LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Graciela LeijaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern BurbeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.