Legal Opinion

State of Arizona Ex Rel. Polk v. Hon. campbell/francis Frederick Kraps

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2016No. CR-15-0303-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice TIMMER,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Under AR.S. § 13-3212, enhanced and consecutive sentencing provisions apply when a defendant is convicted of engaging in child prostitution knowing that the person is a minor aged fifteen, sixteen, or seventeen. We today hold that these provisions also apply when the “minor” is actually an undercover peace officer.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The State indicted Francis Kraps on two counts of child prostitution in violation of A.R.S. § 13-3212(B)(2). 1 During a pre-trial hearing, the superior court advised Kraps that if he was convicted, the court was required to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainArizona Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bsi Holdings, LLC v. Ariz. Dep't of Transp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Graciela LeijaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State of Arizona v. Lynn Lavern BurbeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API