Arizona Department of Water Resources v. McClennen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice BALES,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Under Arizona law, a right to use surface water may be acquired by appropriation. This right may be severed from the land to which it is appurtenant and, subject to the approval of the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources (“ADWR”) and other conditions listed in A.R.S. § 45-172, may be transferred without losing its priority. “Interested persons” may file objections with ADWR to a proposed severance and transfer, and they may seek judicial review if ADWR grants approval over their objections.
¶ 2 We hold that § 45-172 identifies the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Bennett v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- J.D. M.M. v. Hon. hegyi/t.D./state of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Mohave County v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Az Public Integrity v. Adrian FontesArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- David Welch v. Cochise Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.