Legal Opinion

Ticonic National Bank v. Sprague

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1938No. 374PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

The question for decision is whether or not a secured creditor of a national bank, holding a non-interest bearing claim, is entitled to interest for any period subsequent to the insolvency of the bank, when the assets on which he has a lien are sufficient to pay the principal and interest but the total assets of the bank are not sufficient to pay in full all creditors’ claims as of the date of insolvency.

On March 28, 1931, respondent Lottie F. Sprague delivered $5,022.18 to the trust department of the Ticonic National Bank of Waterville, Maine, in trust, under an agreement which authorized…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Sexton v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P.R. Co., and 9 Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API