Legal Opinion
Skol Co. v. Olson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 22, 1945No. Patent Appeal 4988PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
This appeal presents two questions under Section 5 of the Trade-Mark Act of 1905, 15 U.S.C.A. § 85, to determine whether mineral water classified as a beverage is merchandise of the same descriptive properties as antiseptic sun lotion, antiseptic mouth wash, antiseptic cream, lipstick, deodorant, and Skol sun glasses which are classified as medicinal preparations; and whether “Skol,” the name of appellant corporation, is appropriated as a trade-mark by registration of the mark “Skoal.”
The involved marks, “Skol” and “Skoal,” comprise a single word which is identical…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Application of Laskin Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. WrightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Powerine Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Coty, Inc. v. Perfumes Habana, S. A.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
- Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Undergarment Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.