Legal Opinion
Application of Laskin Bros.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 11, 1944No. Patent Appeal 4920PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
’ This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 56 USPQ 471, affirming the final action of the Ex- axniner of Trade-Marks in refusing to register the word “Caress” as a trade-mark for panties, slips, night dresses, combinations, and petticoats in view of a registration previously issued to H. W. Anthony Company for the same mark applied to hosiery.
The original decision of the examiner held that since both marks were the same, and the goods were of the same descriptive properties, the registration was prohibited by statute.
Thereafter, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Packing Corporation v. Tillman & BendelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In Re Keller, Heumann & Thompson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- R. H. Macy & Co. v. H. W. Carter & SonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Application of National Distillers and Chemical Corporation, Doing Business as National Distillers Products CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Skol Co. v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Application of Fleet-Wing Corporation (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Lucky Heart Laboratories, Inc. v. NeumannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. IsenbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.