Legal Opinion
Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided March 6, 1946No. Patent Appeal 5101PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rendered by the First Assistant, 62 U.S.P.Q. 93, affirming the action of the Examiner of TradeMark Interferences in sustaining the opposition of appellee, owner and user of the trade-mark “Cordura,” to the registration of appellant’s mark “Celdura.”
Appellee took testimony in support of its case, appellant being present and subjecting the witnesses to cross-examination.
Appellant concedes that the merchandise to which the marks are appropriated is of the same descriptive properties within the meaning…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Skol Co. v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Lactona, Inc. v. Lever Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In Re Dutch Maid Ice Cream Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- In Re W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- W. E. Kautenberg Co. v. Ekco Products CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Bass Buster, Inc. v. Gapen Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
- Westgate-Sun Harbor Co. v. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.