Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Washington
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 12, 2013No. CV-13-449PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFF HOOFMAN, Justice.
| Appellant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) appeals from the judgment entered against it following a jury trial in Jefferson County Circuit Court. Ford presents five points of error on appeal: (1) whether the circuit court abused its discretion in refusing to admit evidence of seat belt noncompliance pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 27-37-703 (Repl. 2008); (2) whether the circuit court erred as a matter of law in determining that the defective-glass claim was not preempted by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 205 (“FMVSS 205”), 49 C.F.R. § 571.205 (2001); (3)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Stein v. LukasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- GSS, LLC v. Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Blake Roussel v. Clear Sky Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Daniel v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Vivek Dicholkar v. Blake McMillonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Brookewood, Ltd. P'ship v. Dequeen Physical Therapy & Occupational Therapy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.