Coulter v. Dodge, Chancellor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Without stating how this case arose, it will suffice to say that the question presented for our decision is whether the proposed amendment to the Constitution, submitted at the last General Election November 8, 1938, as proposed amendment to the Constitution No. 24, was legally submitted at that election. It is not questioned that a sufficient vote for the amendment was cast to adopt it under the decision in the case of Brickhouse v. Hill, 167 Ark. 513, 268 S.W. 865. The question presented is whether the requirements of the Constitution in regard to amendments proposed by the General Assembly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Brickhouse v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Van Kleeck v. RamerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Rudd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Berry v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Tom Steele v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Bryant v. RinkeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.