Legal Opinion

Gottstein v. Lister

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1915No. 12995PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior -court for Thurs-ton county, D. F. Wright, J., entered July 29,1915, in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action to enjoin the enforcement of an initiative measure prohibiting the manufacture, keeping, sale and disposition of intoxicating liquors, tried to the court upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, J. L. Gottstein et al., and the interveners, Griffin & Mork et al., seek to have the state and county officials enjoined from enforcing the provisions of initiative measure No. 3, prohibiting the manufacture, keeping, sale and disposition of intoxicating liquors, except in certain cases, approved by vote of the people at the general election of November 3, 1914. The cause was submitted to the superior court upon the pleadings and a statement of facts agreed upon by counsel for the respective parties. After hearing argument of counsel upon the record so made, the superior court…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ritchmount Partnership v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API