Legal Opinion
Brickhouse v. Hill
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 16, 1925PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T. C. McRae, Special Chief Justice.
The case of Arlitt v. Hill, No. 9014, has been consolidated with the case of Brickhouse v. Hill, No. 9011, and in this opinion reference will only be made to the consolidated case by the title of Brickhouse v. Hill.
The appellant, in his capacity as mayor, was proceeding, by virtue of an ordinance of the city council, to issue bonds to fund the debt of the city of Little Rock, under the Constitutional Amendment No. 11, which was submitted by the General Assembly to the electors of the State for approval or rejection at the general election held in October,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Ferrell v. KeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Chaney v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Bryan v. Landis, Atty.-Gen'l. Ex Rel. ReeveSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.