Legal Opinion
Wesely v. Flor
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 14, 2010No. A10-478PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the dismissal of her dental-malpractice action for failing to comply with the 180-day deadline for submitting an expert-disclosure affidavit under Minn.Stat. § 145.682, subd. 4. She argues that the district court (1) erred by declining to allow her to substitute an affidavit that identified a new expert witness *585when the expert who was identified in appellant’s previous affidavit was not qualified to give an expert opinion and (2) abused its discretion by failing to extend the deadline for submitting an expert-disclosure affidavit. We affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Teffeteller v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Broehm v. Mayo Clinic RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wesely v. FlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011