Buckner Loan Co. v. Bicher
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover on three promissory notes of $350 each signed by Morris Bicher and Sarah Bicher, payable to the order of plaintiff and bearing elate April 18, 1921. Sarah Bicher defended on the ground that she was a married woman, wife of defendant Morris Bicher, and that the proceeds of the notes in no way benefited her separate estate, i. e., that she was a surety. She had verdict and judgment. Morris Bicher defended on the grounds that the notes were usurious and therefore no interest could be collected on them, and that he was entitled to certain credits on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Morley v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Benedict v. Michigan Beef & Provision Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leavitt v. Monaco Coach Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lewis v. ShiffersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Phillips v. FotheringhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Kelly v. National Casualty CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Niemi v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.