Foster v. Rinz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Collingwood, J., presiding. Case by Seifert Foster, an infant, by Edward Foster, his next friend, and Edward Foster, individually, against Gustav A. Rinz, Sr., and Gustav A. Rinz, Jr., for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The infant plaintiff had verdict and judgment against both defendants for $5,000, the ad damnum of the declaration, for being struck by an automobile owned and operated by defendant Gustav A. Rinz, Junior. The adult plaintiff, father of the infant, had like verdict and judgment for $445, which appears to slightly exceed the amount claimed to have been expended by him, including his own loss of time, growing out of the accident to said infant. Both defendants bring the case here. We shall have occasion to state the pertinent facts as we proceed.
The only evidence connecting the senior defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Sewell Cushion Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Houseman v. KaricofeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Murchie v. Standard Oil CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Ramp v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Poikanen v. Thomas Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Reardon v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.