Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Trover by Louis Lonier and William J. Hoffer, co-partners as Lonier & Hoffer, against the Ann Arbor Savings Bank. There was judgment for defendant on a .verdict directed by the court, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit was commenced by declaration containing a special count for moneys had and received and a count in trover for conversion of a note. The defendant pleaded the general issue. At the close of the testimony, the attorneys of each of the parties contended the judge should direct a verdict one way or the other. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of defendant, and plaintiffs appeal, and assign error upon the direction of a verdict for defendant and the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs are millers at Manchester, and defendant is a banking…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Hamill v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Share v. CoatsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Manska v. San Benito Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Bridwell v. SegelMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.