Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Fotheringham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1936No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 38,747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtToy, J.

Plaintiff, as guardian of Helen Phillips, her minor daughter, brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been caused when the automobile of defendant Fotheringham, being* driven by defendant Trombley, struck and injured said Helen Phillips.

Jury trial was had and a verdict returned for plaintiff in the amount of $2,000 against both defendants who now appeal from the judgment entered thereon.

The accident occurred at about 8 o’clock in the evening of March 11, 1933, on Wenona avenue in Bay City, when Trombley drove his automobile over the east curb of Wenona avenue and struck Helen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foote v. HuelsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. O'Donnell v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mahiat v. CoddeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Poikanen v. Thomas Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trafamczak v. AnysMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Steel Transportation Co. v. WiniarskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  3. Steel Transportation Company v. Anastazia Kazanowski, Adm'xCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  4. Steel Transportation Company v. Richard Krotek, by Theresa Krotek, His Next FriendCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  5. Steel Transportation Company v. Walter Kachel, by Sophie Kachel, His Next FriendCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API