Sandisk Corp. v. Lexar Media, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BREYER, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of Patent No. 5,602,987 (the “’987”). Now before the Court is plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment of defendant’s contributory infringement of Claim 10 of the ’987 and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, as well as defendant’s motion for summary judgment of the invalidity of Claim 10 of the ’987. After carefully considering the papers filed by the parties, and having had the benefit of oral argument on March 17, 2000, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment of contributory…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- IPPV Enterprises, LLC v. Echostar Communications Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- SuperGuide Corp. v. DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
- Petter Investments, Inc. v. Hydro Engineering, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Pickholtz v. Rainbow Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.