Legal Opinion
Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 27, 2005No. 03 Civ. 2604(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Medinol Ltd. (“Medinol”) brings this action for damages and declaratory and permanent injunctive relief relating to the alleged infringement by Guidant Corp. and its subsidiary Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (“ACS”) (collectively “Guidant”) of certain of Medinol’s patents. 1 This Opinion resolves Guidant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of invalidity, which asserts that all claims of the patents-in-suit are obvious as a matter of law. 2 For the following reasons, Guidant’s motion for summary judgment on invalidity is…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jeffreys v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Bam Bags, LLC v. Zip-It Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Serby v. First Alert, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Serby v. First Alert, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015