Legal Opinion
Pickholtz v. Rainbow Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 1, 2003No. C 98-2661 CRBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BREYER, District Judge.
This suit involves the alleged infringement by defendants Rainbow Technologies, Inc. and Software Security, Inc. (“Rainbow”) of U.S. Patent No. 4,593,353 (“the ’353 patent”) owned by plaintiff Andrew Pickholtz. Now before the Court is Rainbow’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and Rainbow’s motion for partial summary judgment regarding damages.
The ’353 patent relates to a device used to protect against unauthorized access to computer software. The device includes a pseudorandom number (“PRN”) generator that, when sent a first number,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Marposs Societá per Azioni v. Jenoptik Automotive North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017