Legal Opinion

Petter Investments, Inc. v. Hydro Engineering, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 6, 2009No. Case 1:07-CV-1033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.

Defendants, Hydro Engineering, Inc.’s and Hydro Engineering & Supply Co., LLC’s (collectively “Hydro”), have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement against Plaintiff, Petter Investments, Inc. (“Petter”) for infringement of Hydro’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,799,-591 (the “'591 patent”) and 7,258,749 (the “'749 patent”). In particular, Hydro seeks summary judgement that: (1) Petter’s “water channel” wash pads infringe claims 1 and 15 of the '591 patent; and (2) Petter contributes to and induces the infringement of claims 2 and 3 of the '749…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petter Investments, Inc. v. Hydro Engineering, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
  2. Sunless, Inc. v. Selby Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API