Legal Opinion
Senegram v. Groobman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1939No. Civ. 12032PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The plaintiff was injured on December 26, 1936, in a collision between an automobile driven by his wife and one driven by defendant Irene Groobman. The last-mentioned car was owned by defendant Lewis Groobman and was being driven with his knowledge and consent. Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1750.
Plaintiff was riding with his wife and it is claimed that she was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Mrs. Senegram was driving in a northerly direction on Chicago Street in the city of Los Angeles and as she approached the intersection of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoffmann v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Wynne v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Robinson v. ClemonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lee v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Briggs v. KoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilcox v. SwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lundgren v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Stoltz v. ConverseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gault v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955